NEWS

Latest news | News Archive


A new UNECE/FAO Report State of forest ownership in the UNECE region

Wednesday, December 19 , 2018 192

picture_243_620_300.jpg
picture_243_621_300.jpg

The UNECE/FAO just published an interesting report about the complexity of forest ownership and tenure.

Forests cover 42 percent of the UNECE region, which embraces countries of North America, Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia. Forests are not only the dominant type of land cover but also a critical element for ecosystem maintenance and sustainability. While studies and reports on the region’s forests undertaken so far provided extensive information on their state and functions in general, there is little information about their owners and managers.

To address this gap and to learn more about forest ownership, how it is changing, and the implications for management and policy, the UNECE and FAO, in cooperation with the COST Action FACESMAP as well as with support of the European forest owners’ organizations developed a study on the “State of Forest Ownership in the UNECE Region”, based on a survey of national data and expert opinion.

 

Although over 80 percent of the UNECE region’s forests are publicly owned, the region is characterized by the most diverse ownership structures in the world. However, apart from Canada and the Russian Federation which share almost two thirds of the UNECE region’s forests, in the remaining part of the region the shares of public and private forests are almost equal. Within the two broadest categories of ownership, public and private, forests are owned and managed through a variety of tenure and institutional arrangements. Pan-European region adds to this complex picture even more than the others.

The study presents information gathered on forest policies and forest management under different ownerships and describes different public and private forest owners along with their perspectives on forest management.

At the seminar held in European Forestry House, Brussels on 14 December 2018, the authors of the study presented an analysis of forest coverage, forest policies and forest management under different ownership schemes. The main results of the study, including the the thematic inter-active database, guided discussion of the status, trends, opportunities and challenges of forest ownership in the region, with the representatives of European Institutions, representatives of forest owners’ organizations and the Brussels-based stakeholders.

 

“Ownership may appear to be a relatively straightforward concept, but when we examine it we find it is quite complex, entailing different rights, responsibilities, organizational procedures and understandings that vary considerably depending on country and context. These differences, in turn, profoundly affect the way forests are managed and thereby the benefits that can be derived from them” explained Prof. Anna Lawrence, the coordinating lead author of the study.

 “Forest ownership structure in pan-European region is very complex and requires proper explanation and understanding. This is particularly important since the public continuously expects to be able to benefit from multiple goods and services provided by forests. This is particularly important in case of state owned forests. The report explains this complex system and allows to understand who can use what resource, for how long and under what conditions” said Mr. Piotr Borkowski, Executive Director, European State Forest Association (EUSTAFOR).

“One of the main challenges faced by European private ownership today is fragmentation and parcelisation. This is confirmed by the UNECE/FAO report which brings very useful insights to better understand this situation. In this context, when dealing with forest-related issues, the EU policy framework should always keep in mind forest owners possibilities and motivation to manage their forests and to gather their strengths. Overall, acknowledgement of property rights plays a key role in fostering the active and sustainable management of forests” commented Ms. Fanny-Pomme Langue, Secretary General, Confederation of European Forest Owners (CEPF).

“Public forest ownership is very diverse and, among other types, includes communal forest ownership. Communal, sometimes also called municipal, form of ownership is characterized by significant welfare impact of forest management on local communities, both urban and rural. Therefore, it requires proper recognition among other ownership types” added Mr. Maximilian Hauck from European Federation of Forest-Owning Communities (FECOF).

 

You can have more infiormation and a sumary of the report using this direct link to the FAO web site: http://www.unece.org/forests/areas-of-work/forest-resources/methods-and-processes/forest-ownership.html

 

The UEF Presidency wishes all foresters a merry Xmas.

Previous | Next

LATEST NEWS

A new joint statement : Call for an updated and stronger EU Forest Strategy
Friday, January 11, 2019 88
The Union of European Foresters signed on the 11th of January 2019 a new joint statement at the begining of the first Romanian presidency of the E ...

21 March 2019 International day of Forest: Forest and education
Monday, January 07, 2019 109
      The United Nations General Assembly proclaimed 21 March the International Day of Forests (IDF) in 2012. The Day celebrates and raises awareness of the importance ...

21- 23 March 2019 World Wood Day in Austria
Monday, January 07, 2019 94
    The 2019 WWD Symposium and the 2nd IUFRO Forest Products Culture Research Group Colloquium which will be held from Thursday 21st to Saturday 23rd of March 2019 in the Austrian Ope ...

A new UNECE/FAO Report State of forest ownership in the UNECE region
Wednesday, December 19, 2018 192
The UNECE/FAO just published an interesting report about the complexity of forest ownership and tenure. style="margin-left:0px; margin-right: ...

22nd European Forum on Urban Forestry 22-24 May 2019 Full of energy
Monday, December 17, 2018 193
Urban forests are vibrant places for multifaceted recreational activities, social gathering and mental restoration, but also provide biomass for an urban bioeconomy. They are full of energy. And so is th ...